Tuesday, September 23, 2008
The government is talking $TRILLION bailout . . . what do today’s economic reality mean for your direct mail plans?
Some folks are business as usual, others are running for the hills and yet others are launching new campaigns and programs into this challenging season. As others have answered -- much of this
However, if it were just cyclical, nobody would be talking about nearly a $1,000,000,000,000 (TRILLION) in taxpayer dollars to stabilize the current economic reality.
All that being said, direct mail at this time is challenging and has been for a number of months, for both acq and renewal – what are the alternatives?
Donors are lapsing faster than ever, so we all need new donors -- if we don't do acq, it may save us some expense money today, but hurts big-time in the long-run.
You could also say that if other orgs are cutting back on acquisition there remains an opening -- an opportunity -- for those who will proceed with more aggressive plans.
Also, the media (and in turn, the election cycle) has a vested interest in talking down the economy so it give them something to talking about besides “lipstick on a pig.”
That notwithstanding, individual organizations may be able to turn the current situation into a cry for urgent appeals for year end. Especially well positioned would be those that cater to social
services and homeless and hungry and those that serve the under-served.
To make a long-story short (too late, I know) another possible silver lining to the current situation on certain organizations may be the fact that if individuals that are able to join or donate to
your cause/appeal now, may be better positioned for longer term performance, since they ostensibly may have need to make a more "thought-out" to give and were less impulsive with their giving and may
stick around longer.
3:55 pm est
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
2:12 pm est
Wash, Rinse, Repeat….
ongoing reevaluation of all aspects of your program be it, copy, design, timing, list selection, house file segmentation, etc. must be at the core of internal
processes or collaborative processes with your agency partners.
Annual or bi-annual file and creative audits as well ongoing results analysis must
be integral part of operations to move programs to their “next level."
We all get bogged-down in day-to-day tasks
and proofs, moving copy
through endless editorial review processes, etc….SO, its easy just to push things through.
PAUSE – take a breath (make some time for just thinking). Have a “McDonald’s or Starbucks moment” – great ideas come in strange places. The
grind is NOT kind to creative/analytical thinking.
By periodically “off-site-ing” and looking at ALL the mail pieces sent to donors over the course of the year (along with the results), you will be amazed at the things that went
by. These regular creative audits allow you and your team and agency partners to take the time (don’t rush it) to see if all the strategies you started the year
with were correctly executed and if the performed as expected. What tests were winners and what tests were embarrassing?
you are not writing for you, your President or Chair of the Board. Clarity and simplicity are key. Would your mother or grandmother be able to
read, understand and more importantly take clear action based on your letter?
Examine graphics, look at fonts
(styles/sizes), copy letter length, premium vs. non-premium mix, etc.
2:11 pm est
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Why do you ask…?
The future of direct response fundraising
cannot be driven around the all-too-common concept of . . . its October or April, its time for a mailing or we need to do the “filling in the blank” mailing again “just like last year.” Successful
programs are mindful of the “why” and the “who” and the intended “engagement for impact” before the copy writer “puts pen to paper.”
- You don’t
- You are
offering an opportunity to change the world
- You can join
with others to end/fix/solve ______________
- Nobody really
cares that it is the end of your fiscal year
- Mini-Campaigns offer a chance to be part of something important
3:56 pm est
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
It’s not all about me…
Organizations and their communications
messaging must be compelling and engaging and above all must be flexible and “donor-focused” in approach to meet individuals where they are and not force individuals to meet the organization where it
is. Multiple tracks of touch-points and communications strategies must be implemented to maximize donor-engagement with the mission and its outcomes.
Being “donor-focused” removes the
institutional thinking from the donor relationship enhancing communication. Your organization simply becomes a conduit – a facilitator – for what the donor or prospect already wanted to do.
You just gave them an opportunity to make it happen.
In most cases,
your organization faces competition with other NPOs within your mission circles, let alone other categories. Your communications MUST demonstrate your organization “worthiness of support” and “best in class-ness” well beyond, “we’ve been doing xxx for over xxx
use huge numbers exclusively to show how great a task you have to undertake do so at their own peril. Avoid the danger of the “drop in the ocean”
scenario. I read a
recent quote as an excellent example -- it suggested that rather than asking for a gift of $25 to combat global warming, make sure that your language enables donors gifts to be meaningful. Why not
make that $25 gift help fund a particular study or help mobilize grass-roots efforts, etc. Tying gifts to results is an absolute
Thank you, thank you, thank you, AND
Make the most of donor
newsletters. Don’t send an institutional piece that is already being printed by your communications or PR team and send it to donors. Donor desires for results demand a specific donor stewardship
publication that serves as yet another thank you for their support. It is a report back to donors on results (results that are possible
thanks to donor gifts). It engages donor in your successes. The most effective newsletters (that improve donor-engagement and increase
income) are usually short, timely and NOT glossy magazines.
Communication style must feel as if you
know your donors. Remember, you are writing to ONE person at a time – NOT hundreds of thousands or more.
Use data you have in your
database to truly personalize your appeals far beyond “Dear Ms. Sally Samplename,”
9:24 am est
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
“Direct Mail” is NOT direct mail – it IS part of an integrated direct response program
that includes mail, phone, online, email, space, broadcast, txt, online communities et al and in order to maximize an
organizations reach use of all practicable media is necessary.
Coordinating message and delivering a consistency of brand across all channels
instills a higher sense of professionalism and serious to your donor and prospect
Don’t worry about
online or other channel outreach cannibalizing your mail efforts. The end result is far more important – more dollars, more donors and better engaged constituents.
In the age of online communities/email/txt messaging, don’t forget the power of
telemarketing, national and regional space ads (including online) and broadcast media.
today’s voice messaging tools to significantly boost direct response outreach results and participation rates.
media intelligently – some messages work better than others for certain efforts and channels. When using multiple channels in an integrated outreach effort, be sure that the message rings true and is
authentic in demonstrating the impact of your mission.
11:49 am est
Monday, October 15, 2007
Direct Response is NOT a neccesary evil or ugly stepchild
Direct response is NOT the ugly stepchild of a major giving, planned gift, events, foundations/corporate giving programs or a necessary
evil, but part of a comprehensive program that in order to work well, all areas must work together to breakdown the walls (real or imagined) an avoid the silo mentality of “my donor not
If done properly the direct
response/annual fund segment of the donor file serves as a feeder for higher levels of cultivation such as major gifts, planned gifts, volunteer leadership and events. Often unjustly dismissed,
lower donor repeat givers are fantastic planned giving prospects.
Many organizations need more than a few
major donors and foundations to keep operating and affect impactful change – direct response can serve as the operational backbone of funding for many organizations.
annual fund/direct response team should be “at the table” with MG/PG/Events people who are typically “one-to-one” relationship oriented and don’t necessarily have the marketing background the DMers
do and the two orientations can work well together.
Consider teaming with
MG/PG departments to provide ALL direct response support for their operations – it educates your DR team as to what else is going on within development and it may also make it possible for you to
keep charge of all fundraising mail calendars to ensure unity of messaging.
3:14 pm est